Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with

To: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
From: Robert Edmonds <edmonds@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 23:34:14 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] eb8ill$daq$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <20060803174443.GA5123@doctormoo.dyndns.org> <20060805002218.GA5295@wonderland.linux.it> <87u04qds8z.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <[🔎] 200608062215.12373.ajv-lists@netspace.net.au> <[🔎] 20060807100006.1aec4a38@xeniac.intern>

On 2006-08-07, Christian Hammers <ch@debian.org> wrote:
> Let's silently migrate to Debian GNU/kFreeBSD :)

Which also has non-free drivers in the upstream kernel source -- but,
they've been removed from the kernel images.

-- 
Robert Edmonds

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Andrew Vaughan <ajv-lists@netspace.net.au>
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Christian Hammers <ch@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
Next by Date: Newsletter August
Previous by thread: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
Next by thread: Newsletter August
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread