Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with

To: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
From: Christian Hammers <ch@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:00:06 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060807100006.1aec4a38@xeniac.intern>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200608062215.12373.ajv-lists@netspace.net.au>
References: <20060803174443.GA5123@doctormoo.dyndns.org> <20060805002218.GA5295@wonderland.linux.it> <87u04qds8z.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <[🔎] 200608062215.12373.ajv-lists@netspace.net.au>


On 2006-08-06 Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> > But Debian has also made a promise that main will be free. And the
> > kernel breaks that.
> 
> Ok.  Looks like we need to move the kernel to non-free.  Good thing nothing 
> important depends on it.

Let's silently migrate to Debian GNU/kFreeBSD :)

bye,

-christian-

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Robert Edmonds <edmonds@debian.org>

References:
- Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
  - From: Andrew Vaughan <ajv-lists@netspace.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
Next by Date: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
Previous by thread: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
Next by thread: Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread