[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?

On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 13:12:36 +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson <Paul.Hampson@anu.edu.au> said:

> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:57:25AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> I'm already seeing documentation referring to "Debian 3.2 (etch)".
>> Is this really what we want?

>> I remember some of us belatedly suggested sarge should be Debian 4.0,
>> though it was too late (May?) to accept that.

>> I suppose we should decide now if etch is going to be 3.2 or 4.0.

>> Given the ABI change with gcc-4.0 and the introduction of X.org, it
>> seems to me we have ample justification to introduce Debian 4.0.

> Would now be a good time to propose that we version Debian based on
> the version of gcc that gcc-defaults points at?

How about we take the version number of all the packages in Debian, and
use the average as the Debian version number?

Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7  5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net.   Encrypted e-mail preferred.

Reply to: