[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?



On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:57:25AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I'm already seeing documentation referring to "Debian 3.2 (etch)".  Is
> this really what we want?

> I remember some of us belatedly suggested sarge should be Debian 4.0,
> though it was too late (May?) to accept that.

> I suppose we should decide now if etch is going to be 3.2 or 4.0.

> Given the ABI change with gcc-4.0 and the introduction of X.org, it
> seems to me we have ample justification to introduce Debian 4.0.

Would now be a good time to propose that we version Debian based on
the version of gcc that gcc-defaults points at?

^_^

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE
8th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU
The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
Paul.Hampson@Anu.edu.au

"No survivors? Then where do the stories come from I wonder?"
-- Capt. Jack Sparrow, "Pirates of the Caribbean"

This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial
use, duplication and distribution.
-----------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpkU0DscS978.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: