On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:57:25AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > I'm already seeing documentation referring to "Debian 3.2 (etch)". Is > this really what we want? > I remember some of us belatedly suggested sarge should be Debian 4.0, > though it was too late (May?) to accept that. > I suppose we should decide now if etch is going to be 3.2 or 4.0. > Given the ABI change with gcc-4.0 and the introduction of X.org, it > seems to me we have ample justification to introduce Debian 4.0. Would now be a good time to propose that we version Debian based on the version of gcc that gcc-defaults points at? ^_^ -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE 8th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) Paul.Hampson@Anu.edu.au "No survivors? Then where do the stories come from I wonder?" -- Capt. Jack Sparrow, "Pirates of the Caribbean" This email is licensed to the recipient for non-commercial use, duplication and distribution. -----------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpSncLrDK4kE.pgp
Description: PGP signature