Le Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 08:03:25 -0400, Shawn McMahon a écrit: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 05:24:35AM -0500, Pascal Hakim said: > > > > I'm surprised that didn't score higher in spam assassin though; it only > > got: > > > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=4.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE > > autolearn=no version=2.63-lists.debian.org_2004_03_24_1 > > Upgrade and turn on the Bayes stuff; stopped it dead here. > so, i'm wondering, i don't want end up blacklisting debian-*@l.d.o, but i want to filter in SA and sa-exim, so i whitelisted the lists... now this means crap still gets through. any of you have more clue than i on this? -- @@-----------------------------------------------------------------@@ | ,''`. http://www.debian.org/ | http://www.nuit.ca/ | | : :' : Debian GNU/Linux | http://simonraven.nuit.ca/ | | `. `' | PGP key fingerprint (new one): | | `- | 7C49 FD9C 1054 7300 3B7B | | | 8BF4 6A88 7AE2 711D F097 | @@-----------------------------------------------------------------@@
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature