[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: H/W upgrade for lists ?

On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 03:10:38PM +1000, Daniel Pittman scribbled:
> > And, naturally, you have hard numbers to back up your claim, for
> > situations analogous to the Debian mailing lists. Because it would be
> > terrible to make sweeping statements like that with no evidence.
> ...and personal experience goes a long way.  Testing on around 10,000
> mails showed me that dspam was reasonable inaccurate and would simple
> stop catching spam of any sort for about three hours after processing
> every false positive report...
> So, YMMV, obviously. :)
As with everything. I am going to give dspam a try one of these weeks when I
have a little more time and train it with my corpus of spam/ham to see how
well it works on the lists I'm subscribed to.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: