Re: IDN in Debian (Was: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)

To: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: IDN in Debian (Was: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:26:52 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20031218082652.GA21476@nic.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20031217231629.GA22946@aokiconsulting.com>
References: <20031211233947.GA26040@spawn.mnemosyne-consulting.com> <200312160959.46116.wnewton@cmedltd.com> <20031216172137.GC79360@spawn.mnemosyne-consulting.com> <200312161734.45108.wnewton@cmedltd.com> <20031217125809.GC17964@kosh.informatik.hu-berlin.de> <[🔎] 20031217161551.GA14684@nic.fr> <[🔎] 20031217231629.GA22946@aokiconsulting.com>

On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:16:29AM +0100,
 Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org> wrote 
 a message of 30 lines which said:

> *.debian.net ready for this?  Mail gateway works?  Just CURIOUS :-)

AFAIK, Postfix is not IDNized but you can always put punycode
(xn--something.debian.net) in main.cf.

Reply to:

References:
- IDN in Debian (Was: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- Re: IDN in Debian (Was: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)
  - From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: IDN in Debian (Was: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)
Next by Date: Re: Re: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)
Previous by thread: Re: IDN in Debian (Was: Changes in formal naming for NetBSD porting effort(s)
Next by thread: Re: IDN in Debian
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread