On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 09:26, Ryan M. Golbeck wrote: > Alexander Hvostov <alex@aoi.dyndns.org> writes: > > > Note the last eight words in my message: when they want to reply to that > > list. That gives the user a choice as to whether to reply in private or > > to the list. I've explained this sufficiently in other emails; I'm not > > going to repeat myself. > > Your fundamental misunderstanding here is that you are confusing the > person replying to a post and the original-poster. It is the OP who > should be the one to decide whether he wants to receive CC's privately > or not. > > But I notice in some of your other responses that this confusion may > have been cleared up (its difficult to follow a train of thought > through 6 or 7 replies). I don't see how your new suggested CC header > is any less of a dirty hack than you propose M-F-T is. It, too, is a crude hack, but at least it's different from Reply-To. See the other emails I've just sent. Alex. -- PGP Public Key: http://aoi.dyndns.org/~alex/pgp-public-key -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS d- s:++ a18 C++(++++)>$ UL+++(++++) P--- L+++>++++ E---- W+(+++) N- o-- K+ w--- !O M(+) V-- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP+(+++) t* 5-- X-- R tv b- DI D+++ G e h! !r y ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part