On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 21:38, criggie wrote: > On 18 Jan 2003 20:33:03 +0100 > "Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder" <avbidder@fortytwo.ch> wrote: > > > On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 13:49, Shawn McMahon wrote: > > Hmmm. This reminds me of my old project of a transatlantic SCSI > > cable...(after all, there are some IP-over-SCSI patches floating > > around, I believe). > > How about this then? > http://criggie.dyndns.org/scsi/ Two computers on the same SCSI cable is ok, what I was referring to was the sequel to that: having the two computers see each others controller, and do networking with it. http://w3.ualg.pt/~dubuf/ipscsi.html Yes, it's basically totally useless. > Two machines on the same scsi bus (one was running debian, so its still > on-topic) on-topic-ness is, I believe, not an issue anymore in this thread... Nonetheless, I believe I should declare EOT here. cheeers -- vbi -- Money is the root of all evil, and man needs roots.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part