On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 01:30:28AM -0800, Alexander Hvostov said: > > I don't see Mail-Followup-To in RFC 2822. Where is it specified? Doesn't need to be. It's text in my message explicitly asking you NOT to carbon-copy me. Policy for this list requires you to not carbon me unless I specifically ask you to, so I'm going above and beyond the requirements of the rules by specifically asking you not to. > I've got a suggestion for you. Send Reply-To instead of > Mail-Followup-To. That's specified in RFC 2822 and should be supported > by all mailers. Reply-To is not the proper header for asking that list posts not be carbon copied. It is the proper header for specifying that private replies be directed to a different email address than the "From" address. -- "Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything offered to me as the result of an unsolicited email message. Nor will I forward chain letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large numbers of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online community." - Roger Ebert, "The Boulder Pledge"
Attachment:
pgpR5CaHFQ1Nr.pgp
Description: PGP signature