Yes, sorry to be annoying... gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) gpg: Signature made Sat Jan 4 04:46:48 2003 CET using DSA key ID 758D7ED9 gpg: BAD signature from "Alexander Hvostov (Primary) <alex@aoi.dyndns.org>" You have > X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) I have evolution 1.2.1-1.1 (this is Debian evolution + Jeffs latest patch, home built) and gnupg-1.2.1-2. Now it gets interesting. Was this message damaged? cheers -- vbi -- featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/subkeys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part