Hello, On Sun 18 Sep 2022 at 03:11PM +02, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 11:57:48PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: >> From my side, I'd be fine with the TC pausing any action on this issue and >> waiting for our mail to d-devel first. This is assuming that if there is no >> opposition to the DPKG_ROOT idea, that Steve then also has no objection against >> merging our patch. >> >> Helmut, what do you think? > > I think that the CTTE is so slow that there is no need to pause in any > way. The d-devel thread seems rather boring, so we may as well move > ahead. > > Let me restate that I see this as a procedural issue. I believe that a > maintainer has an obligation to communicate in a reasonable way. For > instance, we file RC bugs when the maintainer address bounces. I argue > that maintainer communication isn't working for pam. Even if more > arguments against DPKG_ROOT pop up now, I kinda find it late on > procedural grounds. > > So no, let's not pause this. Nothing has changed really. While Steve did > reply, that doesn't happen to please Sam. If the three weeks expired > today, I would have referred it to the CTTE as well. You'll have seen it, but for the benefit of others, at our meeting this week we decided that we will review the patch and determine whether we have a consensus about applying it during our next monthly meeting. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature