On Sun, 2022-07-17 at 14:12 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 11:34:36 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 00:56:14 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > [some discussion of the transition to merged /usr] > > Please note that #994388 has been closed and archived, and does not > accept new messages, so I've removed it from Cc. > > If your intention is to keep the TC updated on the progress of > merged-/usr > for our information, and maybe get some informal advice from > individual > TC members, then debian-ctte@lists.debian.org seems appropriate. > > If you would like the technical committee to make use of any of its > constitutional powers > (https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution#item-6) > regarding merged-/usr or otherwise, please open a new bug with the > request. In particular, requesting advice from the TC as a whole (as > I > did in #911225) would be an appropriate reason to open a new bug. If > it > becomes necessary to overrule a maintainer, that would also be a > topic > for a bug report. So the primary intention was the question at the bottom of the first mail - double-checking that the proposed plan matches and complies with the decision made by the TC last year, and if it does, informing on the intention to enact it. I would have imagined this wouldn't require a formal vote, but I am no constitutional lawyer :-) If you tell me a formal bug is required for this, I am happy to open one. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part