[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits from the Technical Committee

Re: Paul Wise
> If you don't feel each decision deserves a mail, then I think there
> should at least be a summary of decisions in a shorter time period than
> the yearly bits mail. Either a more regular bits mail or via DevNews:
> https://wiki.debian.org/DeveloperNews

DevNews seems like a good place to post the "low profile" decisions.

I still don't think we should post things like rename.ul do d-d-a -
it's not of general interest to the project, and d-d-a would just
further emphasize the implicit "we had to override the maintainer
since they apparently did a bad job" part, which seems


Reply to: