[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1003653: Revision of removal of rename.ul from package util-linux


Thanks for the feedback on my previous draft; here's a revised ballot.

I propose a ballot as follows - if no-one suggests further options in the mean time, I will call for a vote on this ballot on Tuesday, after the weekend of public holidays.

From a procedural point of view, I am formally withdrawing both ballot options I proposed in <[🔎] 9012b2bf-dd1f-afc4-7f62-75ba4116bfa7@debian.org> (thus voiding that process per constitution, and starting afresh.


There are two "rename" programs - the perl rename, and the util-linux rename. Debian and its derivatives have shipped the perl rename as /usr/bin/rename, whilst other distributions (e.g. Fedora) have shipped the util-linux rename thus. The two implementations are incompatible. Users might reasonably desire both implementations to be available on the same system; they are designed to meet different needs.

Backwards-compatibility (and the lack of a compelling argument that rename from util-linux should replace perl rename) means that /usr/bin/rename in Debian should remain the perl rename.

Prior to bullseye, util-linux's rename was shipped as /usr/bin/rename.ul; Debian's users who wish to use util-linux's rename will expect it to be in this location.

===End Rationale

===Begin Resolution

The Technical Committee overrides the util-linux maintainer, and requires that util-linux's rename should be shipped in a binary package built from src:util-linux. If this package Conflicts with the rename package, then it should not contain any other binaries.

The Technical Committee further requires that this binary should be shipped as /usr/bin/rename.ul

===End Resolution

A: Override util-linux maintainer, approve entire resoltuion
B: Override util-linux maintainer, approve only first paragraph of resolution
N: None of the above



Reply to: