Bug#963112: Request for advice on katex rejected by ftp masters
On 2020, ജൂൺ 19 4:55:52 PM IST, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
>Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> writes:
>
>> Package: tech-ctte
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The general case was discussed earlier and a recommendation was given at
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54
>>
>> I'd like a confirmation from you if katex was following your recommendations or not. I think katex should be a separate binary package because it is shipping a user facing executable. But ftp masters don't agree with my interpretation.
>>
>
>Practically speaking, what are you hoping for here? The technical
>committee cannot override delegates, and has already provided a detailed
>answer to the request for advice.
Whether ctte thinks this specific case is in alignment with the guidelines you issued earlier. I want to know your opinion. If you think I followed the guideline and ftp masters did not, then that can help me if I propose a GR. I want to get second opinion before going ahead with a GR.
>d
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Reply to: