Bug#963112: Request for advice on katex rejected by ftp masters

[David Bremner <david@tethera.net>]

Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> writes:

> Package: tech-ctte
>
> Hi,
>
> The general case was discussed earlier and a recommendation was given at 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54
>
> I'd like a confirmation from you if katex was following your recommendations or not. I think katex should be a separate binary package because it is shipping a user facing executable. But ftp masters don't agree with my interpretation.
>

Practically speaking, what are you hoping for here? The technical
committee cannot override delegates, and has already provided a detailed
answer to the request for advice.

d