Bug#934948: Dropping dependencies to avoid extra binary package when same source package targets more than one environment

[Pirate Praveen <praveen@onenetbeyond.org>]

On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:29:33 +0530 Pirate Praveen 
<praveen@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 00:01:01 +0530 Pirate Praveen 
> <praveen@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
> >  > * asking the maintainers of the Ruby libraries that ruby-task-list
> >  >  recursively depends on (such as ruby-rack) to remove *their* 
> > dependencies
>
> Looking at ruby-rack now, it ships /usr/bin/rackup executable. So it 
> looks like a new binary package rackup needs to be created in this case 
> if I understood the decision correctly. Or can this be considered a 
> non-userfacing executable? I don't know if any package use rack directly.

Fortunately, ruby-task-list dropped dependency on ruby-rack from version 
2 and ruby-activesupport and ruby-nokogiri is only required for older 
versions of ruby. So we will just need to take care of 
ruby-html-pipeline and we can remove the other dependencies.