> * asking the maintainers of the Ruby libraries that ruby-task-list> recursively depends on (such as ruby-rack) to remove *their* dependencies
Looking at ruby-rack now, it ships /usr/bin/rackup executable. So it looks like a new binary package rackup needs to be created in this case if I understood the decision correctly. Or can this be considered a non-userfacing executable? I don't know if any package use rack directly.