Hello Marga, On Wed 15 Aug 2018 at 11:35AM +0200, Margarita Manterola wrote: > Apart from this, the concern that has been raised about making packages > instabuggy is valid. I would like our decision to include that this > should > be SHOULD first, giving maintainers a window of time to fix their > packages > and only become a MUST once those packages have been fixed (or something > along those lines, maybe after buster is released). I'd like to suggest giving a window of time. Otherwise the policy process alone won't really have the authority to switch from should->must. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature