Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> writes:
> This should be implemented in Debian Policy by declaring that a a
^^^
You've this doubled 'a' on two occasions in this text.
Presumaly we would not want to see new packages adopting the use of
vendor-specific patch series prior to Buster.
Do we need to make the "SHOULD NOT" conditional on the package already
having a vendor-specific patch series at the time of this resolution?
Cheers, Phil.
--
|)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd.
|-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
|(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature