Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive

To: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>, 904302@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive
From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 11:19:27 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87a7ohcnkg.fsf@hephaestus.silentflame.com>
Reply-to: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>, 904302@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87sh2aelmf.fsf@err.no>
References: <87o9eyeofq.fsf@silentflame.com> <87o9eyeofq.fsf@silentflame.com> <877ekztkew.fsf@err.no> <87o9eyeofq.fsf@silentflame.com> <[🔎] 87sh2aelmf.fsf@err.no> <87o9eyeofq.fsf@silentflame.com>

Hello,

On Sat 15 Sep 2018 at 07:06PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:

> A first draft is below, feedback on wording and content appreciated.

LGTM, thank you.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>

Prev by Date: Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive
Next by Date: Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive
Previous by thread: Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive
Next by thread: Bug#904302: Whether vendor-specific patch series should be permitted in the archive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread