debian-ctte Jan 2017 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

---

Bjørn Mork

• Bug#846002: Debian Installer Stretch RC 1 release Jan 17

Andreas Tille

• Bug#846002: Debian Installer Stretch RC 1 release Jan 17
• Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important - ballot proposal Jan 09

Ansgar Burchardt

• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 14

Daniel Kahn Gillmor

• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 11

Debian Bug Tracking System

• Processed: Blends install options removed from tasksel menu Jan 16
• Processed: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 11
• Bug#850967: marked as done (Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts) Jan 12

Didier 'OdyX' Raboud

• No TC Chair election yet Jan 04
• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 11
• Bug#850887: [TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot Proposal: #850887 binutils mips Jan 12

gregor herrmann

• Bug#850887: To the right bug this time: Why do you want us to keep this open? Jan 17

Ian Jackson

• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts [and 2 more messages] Jan 11
• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts [and 1 more messages] Jan 12
• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 11
• Bug#850887: [TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot Proposal: #850887 binutils mips Jan 12
• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 11
• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 11

James Cowgill

• Bug#850887: To the right bug this time: Why do you want us to keep this open? Jan 17
• Bug#850887: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug Jan 12
• Bug#850887: To the right bug this time: Why do you want us to keep this open? Jan 17

Josh Triplett

• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 12
• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 14
• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 12

Julien Cristau

• Bug#850887: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug Jan 11

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer

• Bug#850887: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug Jan 10
• Bug#850887: TC Involvement: MIPS and binutils Jan 11
• Bug#850887: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug Jan 12
• Bug#850887: TC Involvement: MIPS and binutils Jan 11
• Bug#850887: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug Jan 11
• Bug#850887: TC Involvement: MIPS and binutils Jan 11

Michael Biebl

• Bug#850887: To the right bug this time: Why do you want us to keep this open? Jan 17
• Bug#850887: To the right bug this time: Why do you want us to keep this open? Jan 18
• Bug#850887: To the right bug this time: Why do you want us to keep this open? Jan 17

Nikolaus Rath

• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 12

Ole Streicher

• Bug#846002: Debian Installer Stretch RC 1 release Jan 17
• Bug#846002: Debian Installer Stretch RC 1 release Jan 15
• Bug#846002: blends-tasks must be priority:standard and not make a mess out of tasksel menu Jan 31
• Bug#846002: blends-tasks must be priority:standard and not make a mess out of tasksel menu Jan 30
• Bug#846002: Debian Installer Stretch RC 1 release Jan 16

Philip Hands

• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 13

Sam Hartman

• Bug#850887: TC Involvement: MIPS and binutils Jan 11
• Bug#850887: [TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot Proposal: #850887 binutils mips Jan 12
• Bug#850887: To the right bug this time: Why do you want us to keep this open? Jan 16
• Bug#846002: blends-tasks must be priority:standard and not make a mess out of tasksel menu Jan 31
• Bug#850887: [TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot Proposal: #850887 binutils mips Jan 12
• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 11
• Bug#850887: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug Jan 12
• Bug#846002: blends-tasks must be priority:standard and not make a mess out of tasksel menu Jan 31
• Bug#850887: TC Involvement: MIPS and binutils Jan 11
• Bug#850967: Why did you want us to keep this open? Jan 16
• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 13
• Bug#850887: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug Jan 10

Stuart Prescott

• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 12

Tollef Fog Heen

• Bug#850967: Clarify /usr/bin/foo should not be hardcoded even in upstream parts Jan 11

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]