Since I've been asked in an IRC query whether I might be willing to consider this suggestion: Philip Hands <firstname.lastname@example.org> (2017-02-03): > I think this is in part a symptom of mixing up multiple questions in > one request. > > There seems to be a consensus that the priority change was misguided, > and that's the thing that is primarily being decided here. > > If I had had more time in the last month, I'd have put some work into > producing and testing a patch to tasksel to get the blends back in > without the priority changes. Sadly I've not had that time, and I > suspect that we're too late for such things now. > > Personally I think that Cyril's patch to strip out the blends-tasks > tasks was also a mistake -- hopefully we can now revert both the > priority change, and that reaction to it. > > I do have time now, so perhaps while we're reverting those changes > Cyril will be open to persuasion that we could also patch the blends > back in, and make the menu clearer overall using my early suggestion > of prefixing the title lines with === Sure! Feel free to prepare improvements to be reviewed, merged, and tested at the beginning of the buster release cycle. > but I'm certainly not willing to try and force that decision on him > with my TC stick. Thank you. KiBi.
Description: Digital signature