Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important (was Re: Bug#846002: Lowering severity)
Hi Sam,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:28:46AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> For what it's worth, I think the policy question here is not a
> significant one.
>
> Holger is right that we should either fix policy or fix both
> (tasksel-data and blends-tasks).
> I think that is a bug that should get hashed out. I don't think it is
> all that timely, and I don't think it matters much how we handle things.
> It seems clear that if we want the data available for tasksel, then when
> tasksel runs, both tasksel-data and blends-tasks need to be installed.
> How to align policy and implementation is something we should eventually
> figure out.
Thanks for confirming that. So in this bug we are rather discussing the
second point of my remark[1].
> I think the far more important question is whether the presentation of
> blends is what our users need.
Yes. I think I made my point clear about this and you also know that
I'm quite biased here - so no additional comments. :-)
Thanks to all CTTE members for their work
Andreas.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846002#169
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: