Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important (was Re: Bug#846002: Lowering severity)

[Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>]

For what it's worth, I think the policy question here is not a
significant one.

Holger is right that we should either fix policy or fix both
(tasksel-data and blends-tasks).
I think that is a bug that should get hashed out.  I don't think it is
all that timely, and I don't think it matters much how we handle things.
It seems clear that if we want the data available for tasksel, then when
tasksel runs, both tasksel-data and blends-tasks need to be installed.
How to align policy and implementation is something we should eventually
figure out.

I think the far more important question is whether the presentation of
blends is what our users need.