[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important (was Re: Bug#846002: Lowering severity)



Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org> writes:

> On 06.12.2016 10:37, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> And this *is* still pretty confusing, though admitly better than it was
>> half a year ago. 
>
> The current implementation has a popcon of >5000, without a single
> complaint or confusion documented in the web within the last six months.
> This is at least *some* empirical evidence that it is not "pretty
> confusing", and again I would ask you to show any better empirical data
> here to support your own point.

You seem to be mixing up two things here.

Holger was saying that the menu is confusing (as am I).

You're saying that because 5000 people seem to have ended up with this
package on their systems, they were not confused.

Looking at the graph for debian-astro, is seems to follow a similar
curve, so perhaps these are the people that are installing the
blends-tasks (BTW is there an easy way to check which packages are
installed together via popcon?)

There is no need for them to tick the 'Special tasks' menu item in order
to install any of the the blends, so to some tiny extent they were
confused when they did that, were they not?

Cheers, Phil.
-- 
|)|  Philip Hands  [+44 (0)20 8530 9560]  HANDS.COM Ltd.
|-|  http://www.hands.com/    http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
|(|  Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34,   21075 Hamburg,    GERMANY

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: