Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> writes: > Why are TC members complaining that they do not even properly understand > what "browserified" means, instead of using the power to give advice to > structure the discussion? Probably because without a response to #830986, "browserified" either means including Jison output into things, or it cannot possibly cover what's being done to libjs-handlebars, either of which makes the recent bugs against tech-ctte and ftp-master just a little astonishing. Praveen, please respond to #830986 Without such a response, I wasn't even sure if the re-opening of the bug was instead an attempt to get some sort of permission to let the likes of gitlab into main, by temporarily ignoring the non-free dependencies. (I'm not suggesting that as a way forward BTW, but it seemed at least as plausible as what was actually being asked) Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature