Re: Bug#839570: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2 (reopening)
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 10:00:53AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
>...
> I think it's clear that the TC believes that this package is not DFSG
> free.
> I think it's clear that the TC believes perl would be better if the
> situation was improved.
> I thought it was clear we believed perl had a DFSG issue, although IRC
> discussion today makes that less clear.
> I don't think the value of having the TC formally say any of those
> specific things is very high.
>...
Please describe the relevant differences between browserified javascript
and perl that make the TC believe that the former has a DFSG issue but
the latter probably has not, in a way that I can deduct what the TC
would believe regarding the similiar problem related to SQLite.
> --Sam
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Reply to: