Bug#762194: Alternative proposal for init switch on upgrades.

To: Svante Signell <svante.signell@gmail.com>
Cc: 762194@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#762194: Alternative proposal for init switch on upgrades.
From: Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:12:23 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 8761e3nioo.fsf@deep-thought.43-1.org>
Reply-to: Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@debian.org>, 762194@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <1416945651.11764.294.camel__1453.24722766436$1416945651$gmane$org@G3620.my.own.domain> (Svante Signell's message of "Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:00:51 +0100")
References: <[🔎] CALZWFRJ_Qv1vPWRCvTR7hAkJ1ivw8nn_dMZP8H1Q8XkBBZk-AA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20141123021014.GB12045@angband.pl> <[🔎] 1416742353.11764.280.camel@G3620.my.own.domain> <[🔎] 87lhn14oy9.fsf@rover.gag.com> <1416945651.11764.294.camel__1453.24722766436$1416945651$gmane$org@G3620.my.own.domain>

Hi Svante,

Svante Signell <svante.signell@gmail.com> writes:
> Has the proposed (pre-)depends ordering on init been tested and the
> results known?

You might want to read https://bugs.debian.org/762194#142, but the
obligation for tests is really on the side of the people who want this
change (IMO).

Ansgar

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#762194: Alternative proposal for init switch on upgrades.
  - From: Cameron Norman <camerontnorman@gmail.com>
- Bug#762194: Alternative proposal for init switch on upgrades.
  - From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
- Bug#762194: Alternative proposal for init switch on upgrades.
  - From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@gmail.com>
- Bug#762194: Alternative proposal for init switch on upgrades.
  - From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#762194: Alternative proposal for init switch on upgrades.
Next by Date: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie
Previous by thread: Bug#762194: Alternative proposal for init switch on upgrades.
Next by thread: Bug#762194: Alternative proposal for init switch on upgrades.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread