Re: please stop
Joey Hess <email@example.com> writes:
> I am astounded that, in #762194, the technical committe has
> 1. Decided it should make a decision, when no disagreement
> between maintainers of affected packages is involved.
Er, what decision did we make in that bug?
The reason why I supported that resolution is that it's *not* a decision.
It's a statement that says "hey, we were asked to decide this, but there's
a bunch of other stuff going on right now, so here's our plan, and we're
not making a decision at this time." With some clarification of what an
earlier decision meant, just in case anyone was confused.
> 2. Ignored evidence of ongoing work.
> (specifically, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762194#25)
> 3. Plowed ahead with a vote that decides a massively complicated
> issue with a grand total of 3 days of discussion.
I really don't believe that it does this.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>