I am astounded that, in #762194, the technical committe has 1. Decided it should make a decision, when no disagreement between maintainers of affected packages is involved. 2. Ignored evidence of ongoing work. (specifically, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762194#25) 3. Plowed ahead with a vote that decides a massively complicated issue with a grand total of 3 days of discussion. This is not a decision-making process that will yeild a high-quality distibution. Or one that I can be proud to be involved with. Or one that, frankly, gives me any confidence in the technical committee's current membership or indeed reason to continue to exist. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature