[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#746715: the foreseeable outcome of the TC vote on init systems



El Tue, 6 de May 2014 a las 7:54 PM, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> escribió:
Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org> writes:
I haven't gotten any such bug reports, so this is still theoretical, but I think I'd simply reject anything more complicated than simply adding a debian/foo.upstart file to the tree, including adding (and maintaining) hacks or modifying existing SysV init scripts. I certainly won't work on adding an upstart job to my packages myself.
The hacks we're talking about here are pretty minimal: just three lines in the init script that we're mentioning. I think it's pretty straightforward and think that maintainers should just add that support.

In addition, as has been mentioned, they will soon be unnecessary, as Dimitri Ledkov is working to put the functionality into a init-functions.d hook.

[snippity snip]
Doing this via Policy had been my intention, which has been interrupted by my day job becoming absolutely awful over the past nine months or so (four reorgs in eight months, most of them entirely unjustified). I still think that's the best route forward, and am sorry that I've not been able to drive that work. I had intended to be well into it by now.

Hope that stuff clears up! Stress is very stressful, and that is never good. I do not know your taste in music, but maybe you will like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNygDLi9gb4.

Top of the day,
--
Cameron Norman

Reply to: