Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > I don't think this is likely but I can see why you would want to try > that. Thanks. Being new to the TC, I may feel more reluctant to exercise it's process than people more familiar to the role. > And it is different from FD in that if enough people outside the TC > feel that the issue needs to be decided now, it signals that the time > for them to propose a GR has come. While I would lean towards not supporting a GR at this time, I agree that having one not occur in parallel with a matching TC discussion would probably work out better. > And thanks for engaging with the process in a constructive way. We'll make it work somehow. -- keith.packard@intel.com
Attachment:
pgpKHPEDWTqzz.pgp
Description: PGP signature