Bug#727708: Both T and L are wrong, plea for something simpler
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <email@example.com> writes:
> Back then, the gnome maintainers added a dependency on another package,
> which happened to be providing an /sbin/init. This was allowed by the
> Debian Policy of the time as well as by the Debian archive. The
> maintainers of the Policy maintainers haven't tried to rule on this at
> all since then. How is this matter now magically taken off the Policy
> maintainers' hands (while it _is_ a matter of Policy) and become a
> matter for the technical committee?
I appreciate what you're saying here (although I think 6.1.1 overrides
that), but as one of the delegated Policy Editors, I would immediately
punt such a question arising in the Policy context to the TC under 6.1.1
and 6.1.3. There is absolutely no way the normal Policy maintenance
process could deal with this debate.
If it makes you feel more comfortable with this process, please assume
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>