On 05/02/14 at 22:41 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Colin Watson dixit:
>
> >("Decide any technical matter where Developers' jurisdictions overlap").
>
> I think it is not up to the d-i people to decide on the init system
> anyway – especially as not d-i but debootstrap is the canonical way
> to install Debian… and debootstrap goes by whatever ftp-masters put
> into the override files, and whatever package dependencies and meta
> information (such as Essential: yes) there are.
>
> So, “jurisdiction overlaps” seems to fit quite well.
As far as I remember, I don't think that any of the d-i maintainers,
debootstrap maintainers, ftpmasters, or sysvinit maintainers have
claimed that it was their sole jurisdiction to decide on the default
init system. So I agree that there's jurisdiction overlap.
Also, given that:
The Project Leader may:
4. Make any decision for whom noone else has responsibility.
and:
The Project Leader may:
1. Appoint Delegates or delegate decisions to the Technical
Committee.
The Leader may define an area of ongoing responsibility or a
specific decision and hand it over to another Developer or to the
Technical Committee.
Once a particular decision has been delegated and made the Project
Leader may not withdraw that delegation; however, they may
withdraw an ongoing delegation of particular area of
responsibility.
I would be very happy, if felt necessary by the Secretary, to delegate
that decision to the Technical Committee.
Lucas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature