Bug#727708: multiple init systems - formal resolution proposal

To: Michael Gilbert <mgilbert@debian.org>, 727708@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#727708: multiple init systems - formal resolution proposal
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:57:41 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <Pine.BSM.4.64L.1401281456550.25347@herc.mirbsd.org>
Reply-to: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>, 727708@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <CANTw=MMVPw5n80UYq9qkiOEpQY6a9VEFj0eGDveXpdVLF5R9VA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <21222.36951.920001.779170@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <CANTw=MMVPw5n80UYq9qkiOEpQY6a9VEFj0eGDveXpdVLF5R9VA@mail.gmail.com>

Michael Gilbert dixit:

>Why not avoid impeding progress and just let gnome do what it needs to
>work the way it wants, which would involve depending on the right

Excuse me, why is GNOME, specifically, being allowed to “do what it
wants”, in this case? Imagine other software with a more-or-less
legitimate dependency on, meh idk, upstart for example.

No.


bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
<Natureshadow> Warum ist MirWebseite eigentlich so cool?  <mirabilos> weil ich
ich sie geschrieben habe  <Natureshadow> Hast du sie geschrieben oder geforkt?
<mirabilos> geschrieben, from scratch  <Natureshadow> Ach, deshalb finde ich
auch so selten Bugs dadrin. Irgendwie hast du Recht.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#727708: multiple init systems - formal resolution proposal
  - From: Michael Gilbert <mgilbert@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#727708: multiple init systems - formal resolution proposal
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Bug#727708: multiple init systems - formal resolution proposal
  - From: Michael Gilbert <mgilbert@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#727708: multiple init systems - formal resolution proposal
Next by Date: Bug#727708: call for votes on default Linux init system for jessie
Previous by thread: Bug#727708: multiple init systems - formal resolution proposal
Next by thread: Bug#727708: multiple init systems - formal resolution proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread