Re: Bug#727708: init system discussion - the highlights
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 06:55:45 Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Chris Knadle
>
> > I'll just mention that the proposal of switching out the default init
> > system in jessie+1 sounds a bit scary, as it will change a basic
> > administration interface in the middle of a Stable support period.
> > Probably the most interesting scenarios with this involve servers running
> > unattended upgrades.
>
> That's not what jessie+1 means. jessie+1 is the release after jessie.
I was indeed thinking of a point release, so I mistook jessie+1 as
"jessie + .1". Now it makes sense, as the release after jessie is not yet
named.
Thanks.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
Chris.Knadle@coredump.us
Reply to: