Bug#727708: init system question before the technical committee
- To: 727708@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@debian.org>, Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>, Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>, Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>, Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org>, Alexander Vershilov <qnikst@gentoo.org>, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Subject: Bug#727708: init system question before the technical committee
- From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:01:03 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 21106.28847.418961.841111@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Reply-to: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>, 727708@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 21102.21226.938593.484047@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- References: <20131028003813.GC8764@virgil.dodds.net> <[🔎] 21102.21226.938593.484047@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Ian Jackson writes ("Bug#727708: init system question before the technical committee"):
> Steve Langasek writes[1]:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/systemd
...
> So I would appreciate it if you (and by "you" I mean each side of the
> argument) would make sure that your page represents the best case you
> can put forward.
This seems to have come along very well in the past few days.
We now have five camps with pages with substantial content:
https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/multiple
https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/openrc
https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/systemd
https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/sysvinit
https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/upstart
Obviously people will need some time to further flesh this out and
particularly to write rebuttals (or incorporate points into their main
text which amount to rebuttals).
If you're in one of these camps you'll probably want to subscribe to
the pages of the others, so you can follow what they're doing and make
sure to respond appropriately.
How long do people think finalising this is going to take ? There are
some potential problems with setting a hard deadline in advance but
we're hoping to deal with this matter fairly soon now.
Perhaps it would be good if the camp leader(s) for each camp would
reply with a summary of:
- the status of their own main arguments: are you mostly done,
or do you expect to add more substantial points
- the status of their rebuttals: subject of course, to any future
changes by the other camps, how close are you to having what
you consider a good answer to the other camps' points ?
Thanks,
Ian.
Reply to: