Bug#727708: Arguments for tech-ctte (Was: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system)

[Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>]

Ondřej Surý dixit:

>then please submit your arguments directly there.

Sure.

>> Please stick to your side and make arguments for _your_ case, not

My “case” here is to ask CTTE to not make any decision and defer
to the Developers as whole, by means of a GR. As Guillem wrote:

| stop doing work due to this. Also even if a majority of the project would
| disagree with any such decision, subsequently overruling the tech-ctte by
| way of a GR requires more than a simple majority. You know, GRs do not
| eat babies or something.

I think that is, at this point, the only sensible way forward,
because the amount of people that would feel annoyed by a decision,
any decision, made by anyone, at this point in time is just too
large, and a GR is at least “by the people for the people”.

>> That doesn't take away Thorsten's will to make a GR, but I would like to
>> take the case to tech-ctte first.

I’m willing to wait with the GR until CTTE decided (or decided
to not decide), now that the process is started, but I’m not happy
(especially as we lose time considering time-based freeze).

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
16:47⎜«mika:#grml» .oO(mira ist einfach gut....)      23:22⎜«mikap:#grml»
mirabilos: und dein bootloader ist geil :)    23:29⎜«mikap:#grml» und ich
finds saugeil dass ich ein bsd zum booten mit grml hab, das muss ich dann
gleich mal auf usb-stick installieren	-- Michael Prokop über MirOS bsd4grml