On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:29:51PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Thanks Ian. Prodded by this, I've documented the current team formation > > in /intro/organization, which was out of date after recent changes. The > > change will be live at the next website update pulse. > > Thanks. (Do you know how often that happens?) 6 times a day, IIRC. > > It seems to me that the history section of appointments in the tech-ctte > > page is out of date: Manoj should be thanked there, AFAICT. Also, Colin > > is not mentioned in the "Formal nontechnical and procedural decisions" > > section. All in all, I'm not sure if it's worth the effort of keeping up > > to date that part... > > I think we should do so. Someone (I volunteer) should go through the > list archives and look for anything else we're missing. grepping for > "vote" might do it. > > It's a relatively small amount of work to do this when we make a final > decision, compared to the effort of discussing, voting, etc. If it > gets too tedious we can probably automate it a bit more. The bug title makes me believe I didn't convey the scope of my comment well enough. I was referring specifically to the _nontechnical_ decisions section, which seems to boil down essentially to appointments. For the rest, I fully agree it's worth (and important) documenting technical decisions. Given you're working on standardizing BTS usage for tech-ctte purposes, automation can probably be built on top of that. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature