Re: Bug#681834: network-manager, gnome, Recommends vs Depends
]] Ian Jackson
Hi,
> It seems to me that our objectives must include:
[...]
> 3. Users who deliberately removed network-manager in squeeze (which
> they will generally have done by deliberately violating the
> Recommends from the gnome metapackage) should not have to do
> anything special to avoid it coming back in wheezy.
A somewhat tangential question here – is this a general requirement?
Doesn't that prevent maintainers from (worst case) ever upgrading
Recommends to Depends? I'm worried about what precedent this would be
setting.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
Reply to:
- References:
- Bug#681834: network-manager, gnome, Recommends vs Depends
- From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Bug#681834: network-manager, gnome, Recommends vs Depends
- From: Gergely Nagy <algernon@balabit.hu>
- Bug#681834: network-manager, gnome, Recommends vs Depends
- From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
- Bug#681834: network-manager, gnome, Recommends vs Depends
- From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Bug#681834: network-manager, gnome, Recommends vs Depends
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Bug#681834: network-manager, gnome, Recommends vs Depends
- From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Bug#681834: network-manager, gnome, Recommends vs Depends
- From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>
- Re: Bug#681834: network-manager, gnome, Recommends vs Depends
- From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>