Re: Bug#682010: [mumble] Communication failures due to CELT codec library removal
Chris Knadle writes ("Re: Bug#682010: [mumble] Communication failures due to CELT codec library removal"):
> If there was time before the freeze I would have wanted to handle
> this differently -- the Mumble source code in Debian contains a
> directory celt-0.7.0 as well as celt-0.11.0, i.e. the embedded
> versions of CELT that Ron mentioned. (I believe he said the two
> versions are not bitstream compatible, which should explain why both
> are there.) If Mumble is the only package that requires celt 0.7
> then it would have been nice to embed it internally and remove the
> libcelt library to end its proliferation.
Right. But I don't think we want to do restructuring like that at
this point.
Ian.
Reply to: