>> There was (he doesn't maintain anything now) a maintainer who uploaded >> his packages using me (and some other DDs) as a sponsor [4]. >> Not long ago he had a conflict with ftp-team [1]. As a result one of >> his packages was removed from Debian [2] and Ubuntu [3]. It becomes >> clear that he disagrees with DFSG. So I've asked him to orphan all his >> packages. He said that he wouldn't do anything and he confirmed again >> that he disagrees with DFSG totally. >> I think that all his packages should be orphaned. Could You do that? >> 1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610257 >> 2. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610300 >> 3. https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/141763 >> 4. http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=ivan1986@list.ru SL> You say that Ivan is no longer maintaining any of these packages. It seems SL> to me that these packages are therefore already de facto orphaned, and there SL> is no dispute here that needs the Technical Committee to rule. Can you SL> confirm that this is the case? SL> If you are certain that Ivan is not interested in maintaining these SL> packages, it's ok for you to orphan them directly by filing bugs against the SL> 'wnpp' pseudopackage. The key point is he disagrees DFSG. He said that he could continue to maintain but he disagreed DFSG so he wouldn't do anything to fix license issues etc. So I and the other his sponsor (jackyf) don't want to check his packages: if a maintainer disagrees Debian law it is no worth to check his job. He also said that he doesn't use Debian anymore. Now he trolls in debian-russian@ on the subject. -- . ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov : :’ : email: unera@debian.org jabber://UNera@uvw.ru `. `~’ GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21 `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555 E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature