Re: Bug#573745: Please decide on Python interpreter packages maintainership
Hello Steve,
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 23:34, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:02:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> The existing maintainer has not discussed this matter in public with
>> us nor made any public comment. I personally have had no
>> communication with the existing maintainer. There have been a few
>> indirect personal conversations with some people that I know of, but
>> these have not produced conclusions.
>
> This suggests a form of default judgement, penalizing one party for "failing
> to appear" before the TC. However, the stated duties of a maintainer don't
> include defending one's maintenance practices before the TC; while it makes
> our work harder to adjudicate without the maintainer's input, I'm not
> willing to make a political statement like this with my TC vote.
>
> Furthermore, among those who've had indirect personal conversations with
> Matthias is Bdale, a member of the TC; and the only members of the TC who
> have cc:ed Matthias in this discussion have been Bdale and Andi. If further
> comment is required from Matthias, I don't think enough has been done to
> make this clear to him.
Mh, even if I think he is informed of the appeal, and if he wanted to
reply he could have done already , I'll take the blame for not cc-ing
Matthias in all the reply I send complaining for his lack of comments,
so I'm trying to rectify it now.
Matthias, I've just added explicitly added in the loop of this CTTE
latest branch of discussion: may you please summarize here your
position, maybe also discussion some of the several points arose
during the discussion?
(I don't make any other comments since I made my self enough enemies
for today :) ).
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Reply to: