Re: RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not apply
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:11:51PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> reassign 438179 glibc
> thanks
>
> The Technical Committee has decided as follows:
>
> 1. RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not be applied to IPv4 addresses
> by Debian systems, and we DO overrule the maintainer.
> 2. RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not be applied to IPv6 addresses
> by Debian systems. We do NOT overrule the maintainer.
> 3. We recommend to the IETF that RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should be
> abolished for IPv4, and that it should be reconsidered for IPv6.
>
> The supermajority requirement for overruling the maintainer was met.
>
> To the glibc maintainer: would you like to take responsibility for
> implementing the Committee's decision, or would you prefer someone to
> make an NMU ?
Next time, please Cc: the maintainer if you want to be sure to have an
answer (hopefully I have seen that the bug has been reassigned).
Please DON'T NMU the glibc, we will do the necessary in the next upload
to unstable. Does this also apply to stable?
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
Reply to: