[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Call for Votes (was Re: glibc's getaddrinfo() sort order)



On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 07:16:17PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
>  -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>  [ ] Choice X: Do not use rule 9, overrule maintainer, etc., as above.
>  [ ] Choice S: Sort IPv4 addrs according to rule 9 in getaddrinfo
>  [ ] Choice F: Further discussion
>  -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[1] Choice M: Leave the choice up to the maintainers.
[2] Choice F: Further discussion
[ ] Choice X: Do not use rule 9, overrule maintainer, etc., as above.
[ ] Choice S: Sort IPv4 addrs according to rule 9 in getaddrinfo

Given the discussion we've had it's clear we're not willing to consider
this RC, which means stable will remain with its existing behaviour. Given
that, I'm not willing to support overriding the maintainers, upstream
and the relevant standard.

Cheers,
aj

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: