At 1195157881 time_t, Ian Jackson wrote: > 13. We are unlikely to be able to persuade the newer library's > upstream to rename it at this point. As a result, insisting on it > having a different name in Debian would cause considerable > inconvenience to any users of the library and is likely to result > in ongoing confusion. For the record, I asked him to do so and he declined. I'd like to add that others OS (Gentoo, BSD, SuSE, ...) have a libconfig package which is related to the so-called "newer libconfig". Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature