Re: Bug#367709: Call for vote: gcc: requesting libstdc++.udeb
* Clint Adams (firstname.lastname@example.org) [070625 21:43]:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 05:32:53PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > If anyone other than Sven comes up with a good use for a libstdc++
> > udeb, despite the problems described by others here, then I would like
> > people to give it all due consideration. If the situation changes I'm
> > sure that the d-i team and if necessary the committee are capable of
> > changing their minds.
> Could someone assert why "dependency of a potential partimage udeb" is
> not a "good use"?
What is the use case? Installer? - the installer people didn't want it.
(Apart from the word "potential")