Re: Bug#367709: Call for vote: gcc: requesting libstdc++.udeb
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 05:32:53PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> If anyone other than Sven comes up with a good use for a libstdc++
> udeb, despite the problems described by others here, then I would like
> people to give it all due consideration. If the situation changes I'm
> sure that the d-i team and if necessary the committee are capable of
> changing their minds.
Could someone assert why "dependency of a potential partimage udeb" is
not a "good use"?